The Specifics of the NEETs Population in Bulgaria and Romania

Keywords: NEETs, alternative research methodologies, Bulgaria, Romania


NEETs are a social category specific to today's society characterized by increasing inequalities between people, precariousness, and insecurity. At the level of the majority of the population but also among the authorities and specialists (economists, sociologists, psychologists, etc.) the dominant perception is negative on this category of populations often associated with the underclass, dangerous class (Avis, 2014), people getting nowhere (Bynner, Ferri & Shepherd, 1997) or people at risk (Conrad, 2005). The interest for this category of the population is even higher for Bulgaria and Romania because the share of NEETs is the highest in the EU: 23.8% in Romania and 20.7% in Bulgaria (Eurostat database). This paper aims to analyze this category of population to obtain a more realistic image of NEETs, especially in the two Eastern European countries. One of the few positive effects resulting from the accentuation of interest for this category of the population consists in increasing the number of documents (articles, reports, books, etc.) that analyze NEETs. By using alternative research methodologies (literature review) these documents can provide relevant information on NEETs and can provide several clarifications on their situation at the national and European levels.


Avis, J. (2014). Comfort radicalism and NEETs: a conservative praxis. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 24(3), 272-289.

Bynner, J., Ferri, E., & Shepherd, P. (Eds.). (1997). Twenty-something in the 1990s: Getting on, getting by, getting nowhere. Ashgate.

Conrad, D. (2005). Rethinking 'at-risk in drama education: beyond prescribed roles. Res. Drama Education. J Applied Theatre Performance, 10(1), 27–41.

Eurofound. (2012). NEETs – Young people not in employment, education or training: Characteristics, costs and policy responses in Europe. Publications Office of the European Union

Eurofound. (2016). Exploring the diversity of NEETs. Publications Office of the European Union

Furlong, A., & Cartmel, F. (1997). Young people and social change: Individualisation and risk in late modernity. UK: Open University Press.

Furlong, A. (2006). Not every NEET solution: representing problematic labor market transition in early school leavers. Work, Employment and Society, 20(3), 353–369.

Gervais, M. (2006). Exploring moral values with young adolescents through process drama. International Journal of Education and the Arts, 7(2), 1–34.

Littell, J. H., Corcoran, J., & Pillai, V. (2008). Systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Oxford University Press

Nudzor, H. (2010). Depicting young people by what they are not: conceptualization and usage of NEET as a deficit label. Educational Futures, 2(2), 12–25.

OECD. (2007). Working Party on the Information Economy ICTs and gender. OECD

Pearce, N., and Hillman, J. (1998). Wasted youth: Raising achievement and tackling social exclusion. Institute for Public Policy Research.

Quintini, G., & Martin, S. (2006). "Starting Well or Losingtheir Way?: The Position of Youth in the Labour Market in OECD Countries". OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, No. 39, OECD publishing.

Yates, S., & Payne, M. (2007). Not so NEET? A critique of the use of ‘NEET’ in setting targets for interventions with young people. Journal of Youth Studies, 9(3), 329-344.

Volonte, L. (2012). The young generation sacrificed: social, economic, and political implications of the financial crisis. Committee on Social Affairs, Health, and Sustainable Development.

Williamson, H. (1997). Status zero youth and the 'underclass': Some considerations. In R. McDonald (Ed.), Youth, the underclass and social exclusion (pp. 211–226). Routledge.

Worthington, R. L., & Juntunen, C. L. (1997). The vocational development of non-college-bound youth. The Counselling Psychologist, 25(3)323–363.

How to Cite
Neagu , G., Lendzhova, V., & Keranova, D. (2021). The Specifics of the NEETs Population in Bulgaria and Romania. Postmodernism Problems, 11(2), 112-123.

Most read articles by the same author(s)