The specifics of the NEETs population in Bulgaria and Romania

Keywords: NEETs, alternative research methodologies, Bulgaria, Romania

Abstract

NEETs are a social category specific to today's society characterized by increasing inequalities between people, precariousness, and insecurity. At the level of the majority of the population but also among the authorities and specialists (economists, sociologists, psychologists, etc.) the dominant perception is negative on this category of populations often associated with the underclass, dangerous class (Avis, 2014), people getting nowhere (Bynner, Ferri & Shepherd, 1997) or people at risk (Conrad, 2005). The interest for this category of the population is even higher for Bulgaria and Romania because the share of NEETs is the highest in the EU: 23.8% in Romania and 20.7% in Bulgaria (Eurostat database). This paper aims to analyze this category of population to obtain a more realistic image of NEETs, especially in the two Eastern European countries. One of the few positive effects resulting from the accentuation of interest for this category of the population consists in increasing the number of documents (articles, reports, books, etc.) that analyze NEETs. By using alternative research methodologies (literature review) these documents can provide relevant information on NEETs and can provide several clarifications on their situation at the national and European levels.

References

Avis, J. (2014). Comfort radicalism and NEETs: a conservative praxis. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 24(3), 272-289. https://doi.org/10.1080/09620214.2014.943030
Bynner, J., Ferri, E., & Shepherd, P. (Eds.). (1997). Twenty-something in the 1990s: Getting on, getting by, getting nowhere. Ashgate.
Conrad, D. (2005). Rethinking 'at-risk in drama education: beyond prescribed roles. Res. Drama Education. J Applied Theatre Performance, 10(1), 27–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569780500053114
Eurofound. (2012). NEETs – Young people not in employment, education or training: Characteristics, costs and policy responses in Europe. Publications Office of the European Union https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/publications/report/2012/labour-market-social-policies/neets-young-people-not-in-employment-education-or-training-characteristics-costs-and-policy
Eurofound. (2016). Exploring the diversity of NEETs. Publications Office of the European Union https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/bg/publications/report/2016/labour-market-social-policies/exploring-the-diversity-of-neets
Furlong, A., & Cartmel, F. (1997). Young people and social change: Individualisation and risk in late modernity. UK: Open University Press.
Furlong, A. (2006). Not every NEET solution: representing problematic labor market transition in early school leavers. Work, Employment and Society, 20(3), 353–369. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017006067001
Gervais, M. (2006). Exploring moral values with young adolescents through process drama. International Journal of Education and the Arts, 7(2), 1–34.
Littell, J. H., Corcoran, J., & Pillai, V. (2008). Systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Oxford University Press
Nudzor, H. (2010). Depicting young people by what they are not: conceptualization and usage of NEET as a deficit label. Educational Futures, 2(2), 12–25.
OECD. (2007). Working Party on the Information Economy ICTs and gender. OECD https://www.oecd.org/sti/38332121.pdf
Pearce, N., and Hillman, J. (1998). Wasted youth: Raising achievement and tackling social exclusion. Institute for Public Policy Research.
Quintini, G., & Martin, S. (2006). "Starting Well or Losingtheir Way?: The Position of Youth in the Labour Market in OECD Countries". OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, No. 39, OECD publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/351848125721
Yates, S., & Payne, M. (2007). Not so NEET? A critique of the use of ‘NEET’ in setting targets for interventions with young people. Journal of Youth Studies, 9(3), 329-344. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676260600805671
Volonte, L. (2012). The young generation sacrificed: social, economic, and political implications of the financial crisis. Committee on Social Affairs, Health, and Sustainable Development. https://pace.coe.int/en/files/18739
Williamson, H. (1997). Status zero youth and the 'underclass': Some considerations. In R. McDonald (Ed.), Youth, the underclass and social exclusion (pp. 211–226). Routledge.
Worthington, R. L., & Juntunen, C. L. (1997). The vocational development of non-college-bound youth. The Counselling Psychologist, 25(3)323–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000097253001
Published
2021-08-05
How to Cite
Neagu , G., Lendzhova, V., & Keranova, D. (2021). The specifics of the NEETs population in Bulgaria and Romania. Postmodernism Problems, 11(2), 112-123. https://doi.org/10.46324/PMP2102112

Most read articles by the same author(s)