Exposure to and Self-Perceptions of the Risk of Discrimination and Social Exclusion in Access to Public Goods, Media, Healthcare and Employment

Keywords: social exclusion, discrimination, integration, employment, public services, media, healthcare, Roma


This paper examines the dimensions of social exclusion and the elements of self-perception of discrimination in access to public goods, employment, and in the media, which is juxtaposed with the priorities of the Bulgarian National Roma Integration Strategy (NRIS). The findings are based on the "National representative sociological survey for identifying and elaborating profiles of groups and communities most affected by the risk of discrimination, such as the Roma" carried out in 2017 by "BG ASSIST LTD" and a group of scientific researchers commissioned by the Commission for Protection against Discrimination in Bulgaria. The sample consists of 3,600 individuals aged 18 or over. The ethnic distribution of the respondents is as follows: 2,985 persons of Bulgarian ethnicity, 299 of Turkish ethnicity, 246 of Roma ethnicity, and 69 of another ethnicity. The paper shows the contrast between a variety of quality indicators and the priorities of the NRIS. Based on the data obtained, the risk of discrimination among the Roma and other ethnic groups in Bulgaria is tracked in a comparative manner in major public spheres. The survey results demonstrate that the most vulnerable people in the country are those without health insurance, residing in hard-to-reach settlements, low-qualified and unemployed individuals, people with disabilities, multi-member families and single parents; these categories indisputably include a solid share of Roma. Nevertheless, as the results show, not all Roma and arguably not only Roma are the most disadvantaged and marginalized individuals in Bulgarian society. This study's outcomes are related particularly to profiling the groups at risk, allowing critical linkages between the empirical data and ways of improving equal opportunities and non-discrimination policies. On the part of the NRIS, the paper calls for identifying adequate measures and a balanced approach to political engagement with the planning process in the coming years.


Administrative monitoring report for 2016 for implementing the National Strategy of the Republic of Bulgaria for Roma Inclusion (2012-2020). Council of Ministers. http://www.strategy.bg/StrategicDocuments/View.aspx?lang=bg-BG&Id=726

Berghman, J. (1995). Social exclusion in Europe: Policy content and analytical framework. In G. Room (Ed.), Beyond the threshold: The measurement and analysis of social exclusion (pp. 10-28). Policy Press.

Bolin, R. & Stanford, L. (1991). Shelter. Housing and Recovery: A comparison of U.S. disasters. Disasters, 15(1), 24-34. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7717.1991.tb00424.x.

Carmona, S. (2013). The Romani identity between construction and the recovering of a minority episteme. [Paper presentation]. European Roma Rights Center, seminar 2013. https://www.academia.edu/11943148/The_romani_identity_between_construction_and_recovering

Civil society monitoring report on implementation of the National Roma Integration Strategy in Bulgaria. Focusing on structural and horizontal preconditions for successful implementation of the strategy. (2018). Amalipe Center for Interethnic Dialogue and Tolerance, World Without Borders Association, IndiRoma Foundation, Roma Academy for Culture Education and Gender Alternatives Foundation. https://cps.ceu.edu/sites/cps.ceu.edu/files/attachment/basicpage/3034/rcm-civil-society-monitoing-report-1-romania-2018.pdf

Commission for Protection against Discrimination (CPD). (2017). Annual report 2017. Retrieved October 2019, from http://www.kzd-nondiscrimination.com/layout/images/stories/2015/otchet/%D0%9E%D0%A2%D0%A7%D0%95%D0%A2.2017.pdf

Dimitrov, D., Grigorova, V., & Decheva, Y. (2012). Civil report on the implementation of the National Roma Integration Strategy. Open Society Institute. Retrieved October 2016, from http://osi.bg/downloads/File/2013/BG_civil%20society%20monitoring%20report_BG.pdf

Effective Roma integration measures in the Member States. COM (2016) 424. European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/just/item-detail.cfm?item_id=127519

EU platform for Roma inclusion (2009, April 24). European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/MEMO_09_193

European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA). (2017). Second European Union minorities and discrimination survey. Main results. Publications Office of the European Union. DOI: 10.2811/268615

European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. (2018). Transition from education to employment of young Roma in nine EU member states. Publications Office of the European Union. DOI: 10.2811/962811

EUROSTAT. (2018). People at risk of poverty or social exclusion by educational attainment level (population aged 18 and over). Retrieved September 2018, from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-datasets/product?code=ILC_PEPS04

Fresno, J. (2018). Evaluation of the EU framework for national Roma integration strategies up to 2020. Discussion note for the stakeholder workshop on 15 March 2018. Initial interpretation of the data and preliminary recommendations. European Commission, Directorate-General for Justice and Consumer https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/evaluation-eu-framework-national-roma-integration-strategies-2020-2018-report_en

Giddens, A. (2003). Sociologia [Sociology]. Prozorec

Hristova, S. D. & Milenkova, V. (2020). Self-perceptions of the risk of discrimination and social exclusion: Assessing the six-year aftermath of the National Strategy for Roma Integration in Bulgaria. Journal of Contemporary European Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2020.1767545

Hristova, S. D. (2015). The Counter journalism of Roma minority media in Bulgaria. In О. Ogunyemi (Ed.), Journalism. Audiences and Diaspora (pp.152-167). Palgrave Macmillan

Ivanov, A. (2011). Romi, romska identichnost i romsko vkliuchvane – opit za definirane na nedefiniruemoto [Roma, Roma identity and Roma inclusion – an attempt to define the undefinable]. Nasselenie Review, 3-4, 119-139. http://nasselenie-review.org/bg/%D0%BA%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B6%D0%BA%D0%B0-3-4-2011

Joint report by the Commission and the Council on Social Inclusion. (2004).Council of the EU. Retrieved September 2018, from http://ec.europa.eu/employment_social/soc-prot/soc-incl/final_joint_inclusion_report_2003_en.pdf

Marushiakova, E., & Popov, V. (2012). Gypsies in Eastern Europe. Paradigm

Matache, M. (2016, October 3). Word, image and thought: Creating the Romani Other. Medium.http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/57f29d40e4b095bd896a156a?timestamp=1475519595732

Milenkova, V. & Hristova, S.D. (2017). Is there any light in the tunnel? On the drawbacks of Roma educational integration in Bulgaria. European Quarterly of Political Attitudes and Mentalities 6(1), 1-16. https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/50229

Mirga, A. (2020, November 30). Center for Migration Research University of Warsaw Seminars: Roma on the Fringes of Citizenship in Europe [Webinar]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ujzFaT5oCU

Mordynska, K. (2017). Roma in the European Union. Degree of Master of International Studies, Ewha Womans University, South Korea, http://dspace.ewha.ac.kr/handle/2015.oak/241793

National Strategy for Roma Integration of Bulgaria (2012-2020). Council of Ministers. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/roma_bulgaria_strategy_en.pdf

National Statistical Institute of Bulgaria (NSI). National census – final data. Retrieved April 2018, from http://www.nsi.bg/census2011/NPDOCS/Census2011final.pdf

National Statistical Institute of Bulgaria (NSI). Indicators for poverty and social inclusion /total for the country. Retrieved 30 April 2018, from http://nsi.bg/

Popova, Z. (2014). Roma inclusion: a feasible EU project? Flensburg. Germany: European Centre for Minority Issues. http://edoc.vifapol.de/opus/volltexte/2015/5651/pdf/ECMI_Working_Paper_75.pdf

Roma Education Fund (REF). (2018, October 10). Roma doctors and nurses on the way to success: 10 years of the RHSP program [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TrHxwULPFQ0&t=1s

Room, G. (1995). Poverty and social exclusion: The new European agenda for policy and research. In G. Room (Ed.), Beyond the threshold: The measurement and analysis of social exclusion (pp.1-9). Policy Press.

Tomova, I. (2012). Deconstruction of a qualification error or how a Roma subgroup is constructed. Nasselenie Review, 3-4, 104-118. http://nasselenie-review.org/bg/

United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner (OHCHR). (2020). A special focus on discrimination. Retrieved September 2018, from https://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Discrimination/Pages/discrimination.aspx

van Baar, H. & Vermeersch, P. (2017). The limits of operational representations: Ways of seeing Roma beyond the recognition-redistribution paradigm. Intersections. East European Journal of Society and Politics 3(4), 120-139. DOI: 10.17356/ieejsp.v3i4.412

Wilde, L. (2007). The concept of solidarity: Emerging from the theoretical shadows? The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 9(1), 171–181. doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856x.2007.00275.x

How to Cite
D. Hristova, S., & Milenkova, V. (2020). Exposure to and Self-Perceptions of the Risk of Discrimination and Social Exclusion in Access to Public Goods, Media, Healthcare and Employment. Postmodernism Problems, 10(3), 364-388. https://doi.org/10.46324/PMP2003364