Under the Flags оf Digital Political Agitation

Keywords: political communications, social media, disinformation, media literacy, elections

Abstract

Communication between politicians and citizens is increasingly transferred to the topos of digital platforms. Serious funds are invested for advertising, political agitation, groups and pages are created in which opponents are attacked. The publication is focused on processes and tools for political agitation in social networks such as Facebook, TikTok, YouTube, Telegram. Case studies from Bulgaria and the world are analyzed. Various quantitative and qualitative methods are used - analysis and synthesis of literature, case studies, working with data, involved observation, etc. Case studies show that the public space is increasingly saturated with messages that carry misinformation, conspiratorial narratives, division provoked by fear and hatred, and undermine trust in traditional institutions and authorities. The text proposes the idea that one of the tools for counteracting these social phenomena is the construction of collective immunity from knowledge and skills to improve the digital and information literacy of citizens.

References

Aronson, E. D. (2012). Cyber-politics: How new media has revolutionized electoral politics in the United States. Colgate Academic Review, 9(1), article 7 https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=560c87e312d13b6aee6d6ecdd1e699135556fb03

BNT. (2024, Оctober 29). Velichie ne priznava rezultatite ot izborite, shte iskat paralelno prebroyavane [Velichie does not recognize the results of the elections, they will want a parallel count] https://bntnews.bg/news/velichie-ne-priznava-rezultatite-ot-izborite-shte-iskat-paralelno-prebroyavane-1298669news.html

Facebook. (2024). Krasivo Vetrino [A beautiful fan].

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=421408907322969&set=a.132278909569305&type=3&ref=embed_post ; https://www.facebook.com/krasivovetrino

Garrett, R. K. (2019). Social media’s contribution to political misperceptions in US Presidential elections. PloS one, 14(3), e0213500

Harris, C. (2019). Missing the Mark: Obama and Trump's use of similar communication strategies. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.library.albany.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1031&context=honorscollege_pos

Hatfield, C. (2020). Social media, traditional media, the public, and the US President: evolution through the Barack Obama and Donald Trump presidencies.https://cardinalscholar.bsu.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/39bff659-4609-4f40-9941-070b54d21e7d/content

Herrman, J. (2020). TikTok is shaping politics. But how. The New York Times, 28 https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/28/style/tiktok-teen-politics-gen-z.html

Hindarto, I. (2022). Tiktok and olitical Communication of Youth: A Systematic Review. JRP (Jurnal Review Politik), 12(2), 146-176. 10.15642/jrp.2022.12.2.146-176.

Hindarto, I. H. (2022). Tiktok and Political Communication of Youth: A Systematic Review. JRP (Jurnal Review Politik), 12(2), 146–176. https://doi.org/10.15642/jrp.2022.12.2.146-176

Kata, A.(2010). A postmodern Pandora's box: Anti-vaccination misinformation on the Internet, Vaccine, 28(7), 1709-1716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.12.022.

Kellner, D. (2018). Donald Trump and the politics of lying. In M.A. Peters, S.Rider, M.Hyvönen, T. Besle, (Еds) Post-Truth, Fake News. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8013-5_7

MacDougall, C. D. (1958). Hoaxes. Dover

Meta. (2024). CrowdTangle. https://transparency.meta.com/researchtools/other-datasets/crowdtangle

Perry, L., & Joyce, P. (2018). Tweeting on the Campaign Trail: The When, How, and What of Donald Trump’s Tweets. In The Role of Twitter in the 2016 US Election (pp. 63-74).

Perry, L., Joyce, P. (2018). Tweeting on the campaign trail: The when, how, and what of Donald Trump’s tweets. In C. Galdieri, J.Lucas, T. Sisco (Eds), The role of twitter in the 2016 US election, (pp. 63-74). Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68981-4_5

Kovacheva, R.,Tulechki,N. (2023). Pod prikritie: izpolzvane na Feysbuk stranitsi s razvlekatelno sadarzhanie za razprostranenie na dezinformatsia [Undercover: Using Facebook pages with entertainment content to spread misinformation]. Kritika i humanizam,58, 77-95.

Statista. (2024, August 20). Countries with the largest TikTok audience as of July 2024. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1299807/number-of-monthly-unique-tiktok-users/

Statista. (2024, Auggust 20 ). TikTok penetration in selected countries and territories as of July 2024. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1299829/tiktok-penetration-worldwide-by-country/

Statista. ( 2024, September 10). Number of Facebook users in Bulgaria from August 2023 to August 2024. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1307215/bulgaria-number-of-facebook-users/

Straja. (2024, October 10). Publikatsiata na straja [The Guardian publication].

https://www.facebook.com/strazha.bg/posts/pfbid07C6dbd861ESZK4gTgMBkYgGTZ9snDgWQXb7gQG8NaPS1eEUCV3gydU99wvYxcxdwl

Van der Linden, S. (2015). The conspiracy-effect: Exposure to conspiracy theories (about global warming) decreases prosocial behavior and science acceptance. Personality and Individual Differences, 87, 171–173.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.07.045

Vitak, J., Zube, P., Smock, A., Carr, C., Ellison, N., & Lampe, C. (2009, May). Poking” people to participate: Facebook and political participation in the 2008 election. Paper presented at Annual Conference of the International Communication Association, Chicago, IL. https://jessicavitak.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/ica09_facebook_political-participation.pdf

Zapryanov, Y. (2024,21 oktovmri ). Daily Dose of Peevski: "DPS - Novo nachalo" shturmuva Facebook i TikTok [ DPS a new beginning storms Facebook and Tiktok] https://www.capital.bg/politika_i_ikonomika/bulgaria/2024/10/21/4689703_daily_dose_of_peevski_dps-novo_nachalo_shturmuva/

Published
2024-12-01
How to Cite
Valkov , I. (2024). Under the Flags оf Digital Political Agitation. Postmodernism Problems, 14(3), 331-344. https://doi.org/10.46324/PMP2403331