Ethical Dilemmas About Social Network Sites – A View From Romania

Valentina Marinescu

doi:10.46324/PMP2403259

Valentina Marinescu Faculty of Sociology and Social Work, University of Bucharest, Romania https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9882-5902

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46324/PMP2403259

Keywords: social network sites, ethics, public opinion, personal data protection

Abstract

In contemporary society, the ubiquity of technology has led, somewhat inevitably, to a series of theoretical and practical concerns related to the problems caused by the security of personal data in an interconnected world. The case of “Cambridge Analytica” - Facebook indicated serious legal and practical issues in protecting users’ personal data. This paper presents the previously mentioned phenomenon, its impact on the Romanian population, and the degree of information of Romanian citizens on this subject. From a methodological point of view, the method used was the survey based on a questionnaire, applied to a sample of 220 subjects in April-June 2022. The analysis results indicate that most respondents (88%) consider online data theft personally as a crime. Although 54% of respondents stated that they do not agree with the use of personal data without their consent, 51.1% of respondents considered that they do not agree that the legislation be amended to further protect against the misuse of personal data by online companies. Starting from the analysis of the obtained results, the present paper concludes in favor of public awareness and information campaigns regarding the ethical and legal measures necessary for the protection of the personal data of internet users.

References

Cadwalladr, C. & Graham-Harrison, E. (2018, March 17). Revealed: 50 million Facebook profiles harvested for Cambridge Analytica in major data breach. The Guardian, Retrieved October 15, 2024 from

https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/mar/17/cambridge-analytica-facebook-influence-us-election

González, F., Yu, Y., Figueroa, A., López, C., & Aragon, C. (2019, May). Global reactions to the Cambridge Analytica scandal: A cross-language social media study. In Companion Proceedings of the 2019 world wide web conference, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, United States (pp. 799-806). https://doi.org/10.1145/3308560.3316456.

Henriksen, E. E. (2019). Big data, microtargeting, and governmentality in cyber-times. The case of the Facebook-Cambridge Analytica data scandal (Master's thesis). https://www.duo.uio.no/handle/10852/69743

Hersh, E. D., & Schaffner, B. F. (2013). Targeted campaign appeals and the value of ambiguity. The Journal of Politics, 75(2), 520-534. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381613000182

Illing, S. (2018, April 4). Cambridge Analytica, the shady data firm that might be a key Trump-Russia link, explained. Vox, Retrieved October 17, 2024 from https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/10/16/15657512/cambridge-analytica-facebook-alexander-nix-christopher-wylie

Kanakia, H., Shenoy, G., & Shah, J. (2019). Cambridge Analytica–a case study. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 12(29), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2019/v12i29/146977

Kitchgaessner, S. (2017, October 26). Cambridge Analytica used data from Facebook and Politico to help Trump. The Guardian. Retrieved October 19 2024 from https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/oct/26/cambridge-analytica-used-data-from-facebook-and-politico-to-help-trump

Kozlowska, I. (2018). Facebook and data privacy in the age of Cambridge Analytica. The Henry M. Jackson School of International Studies, 1. Retrieved October 14, 2024. https://jsis.washington.edu/news/facebook-data-privacy-age-cambridge-analytica/

Manokha, I. (2018). Le scandale Cambridge Analytica contextualisé: le capital de plateforme, la surveillance et les données comme nouvelle «marchandise fictive» [The Cambridge Analytica scandal contextualized: platform capital, surveillance and data as the new “fictitious commodity”]. Cultures & conflits, 109(1), 39-59. https://doi.org/10.4000/conflits.19779.

Persily, N. (2017). The 2016 US Election: Can democracy survive the internet? Journal of Democracy, 28(2), 63-76. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jod.2017.0025.

Richterich, A. (2018). How data-driven research fuelled the Cambridge Analytica controversy. Partecipazione e conflitto, 11(2), 528-543. https://dx.doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v11i2p528

Risso, L. (2018). Harvesting your soul? Cambridge Analytica and Brexit. Brexit Means Brexit (pp.75-90).https://www.adwmainz.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Brexit-Symposium_Online-Version.pdf#page=75

Timberg, C. & Hamburger, T. (2018, March 25). Former Cambridge Analytica workers say the firm sent foreigners to advise U.S. campaigns. Washington Post. Retrieved October 18, 2024 https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/former-cambridge-analytica-workers-say-firm-sent-foreigners-to-advise-us-campaigns/2018/03/25/6a0d7d90-2fa2-11e8-911f-ca7f68bff0fc_story.html

ur Rehman, I. (2019). Facebook-Cambridge Analytica data harvesting: What you need to know. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1-11. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/220153793.pdf

Vladeck, D. C. (2018). Facebook, Cambridge Analytica, and the regulator’s dilemma: clueless or venal?. Harvard law review blog. Retrieved October 19, 2024 from https://harvardlawreview.org/blog/2018/04/facebook-cambridge-analytica-and-the-regulators-dilemma-clueless-or-venal/

Wilson, R. (2019, July). Cambridge Analytica, Facebook, and influence operations: A case study and anticipatory ethical analysis. In T. Cruz and P. Sincers (Eds), European conference on cyber warfare and security (pp. 587-XX). Academic Conferences International Limited. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2261006731?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true&sourcetype=Conference%20Papers%20&%20Proceedings

Ethical Dilemmas About Social Network Sites – A View From Romania

Abstract

References

Most read articles by the same author(s)