Leadership Paradigms and Quality of Life in the Digital Age
Abstract
Digital transformation is changing the way leaders interact with their teams, creating new challenges for maintaining a high quality of life and mental well-being among employees. In the conditions of a rapidly changing digital era and global challenges, traditional hierarchical models based on authority and control are giving way to new approaches that emphasize emotional intelligence, collaboration, and sustainable development. These new paradigms seek to integrate individual and organizational efforts to achieve common goals, placing emphasis on the well-being of people and communities. In this context, leadership is no longer perceived only as the exercise of power, but as a process of inspiration, support and creating an environment in which all members of the organization can develop and contribute to the achievement of common goals. By taking into account the needs of employees, technology can be an ally in enhancing individual well-being, if accompanied by effective leadership practices. As a result, leadership becomes a significant factor in improving the quality of life of every employee in a company and its overall results.
References
Аsenov, А., Dilkov, Ts., Еmilovа, I. (2016). Оsnovi upravlenietо [Management Fundamentals]. Акаd. „I. Tsеnоv“ Publishing House
Arnold, K. A., & Connelly, C. E. (2013). Transformational leadership and psychological well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 18(3), 361–373.
Avolio, B. J., & Kahai, S. S. (2003). Adding the "E" to e-leadership: explaining
the impact of technology on leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 31(4), 325-338.
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands-resources theory: taking stock
and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273-
Bass, B.M. (1996). A new paradigm of leadership: an inquiry into transformational
leadership. Army Research Institute for Behavioral and Social Sciences. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA306579.pdf
Bass, B. M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership. Organizational
Dynamics 18 (3).9-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(90)90061-S
Bledow, R., & Frese, M. (2009).A situational judgment test of personal initiative and its
relationship to performance. Personnel Psychology, 62, 227-258.
Burns, J.M. (1978). Leadership. Harper&Row.
Collings, D. G., McMackin, J., & McKendrick, M. (2017). Talent management and
employee engagement in the airline industry: implications for organizational performance. Journal of Business Research, 79, 135-142.
Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Beyond money: toward an economy of well-
being. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00501001.x
Greenhaus, J. H., & Allen, T. D. (2011). Work-family balance: A review and extension of
the literature. Journal of Management, 37(1), 90-116.
Heifetz, R. A., Grashow, A., & Linsky, M. (2009). The Practice of Adaptive Leadership:
Tools and tactics for changing your organization and the world. Harvard Business Press.
Kane, G. C., Palmer, D., Phillips, A. N., & Kiron, D. (2016). Strategy, not technology,
drives digital transformation. MIT Sloan Management Review and Deloitte University Press. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/projects/aligning-for-digital-future/
Kane, G. (2019). The technology fallacy: how people are the real key to
digital transformation. Research-Technology Management, 62(6), 44-49. DOI:10.1080/08956308.2019.1661079
Liden, R., Wayne, S., Zhao, H., & Henderson, D. (2008). Servant
leadership: development of a multidimensional measure and multi-level assessment. The Leadership Quarterly. 19. 161-177. 10.1016/ j.leaqua. 2008.01.006.
Likert R. (1974). Le gouvernement participatif de L’enterprise [The participatory governance of the Enterprise]. Gauther Villars.
Mazmanian, M., Orlikowski, W. J., & Yates, J. (2013). The autonomy paradox: The
implications of mobile email devices for knowledge professionals. Organization Science, 24(5), 1335-1356.
Northouse, P. G. (2021). Leadership: Theory and Practice. Sage Publications.
Pawar, A., Sudan, K., Satini, S., & Sunarsi, D. (2020). Organizational servant
leadership. International Journal of Educational Administration, Management, and Leadership, 63-76.
Peus, C., Braun, S., & Frey, D. (2013). Situation-based measurement of the full range of
leadershipmodel-development and valuation of a situational judgment test. Leadership Quarterly, 24, 777- 795.
Porter, L., & Mclaughlin, G. (2006). Leadership and the organizational context:
like the weather? Leadership Quarterly. 17. 559-576.
1016/ .leaqua. 2006. 10.002.
Spears, L. C. (2010). Character and servant leadership: ten characteristics of effective,
caring leaders. The journal of virtues & leadership, 1(1), 25-30.
Sundvik, L. M. S., Blenkinsopp, J., & Tee, D. (2024). Mental health and the workplace
resilience: The role of emotional intelligence. Available online: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5004104 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.5004104
Tannenbaum, S. I., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2021). The Influence of digital
communication on team performance and engagement. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 57(2), 179-206.
WHOQOL Group. (2012). The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment. https://www.who.int/tools/whoqol
Zhang, Y.; Xie, Y. (2017) Authoritarian leadership and extra-role behaviors: A role-
perception perspective. Manag.Organ. Rev., 13, 147–166. DOI:10.1017/mor.2016.36
Copyright (c) 2025 Academic seminar "Media and Education", Department of Sociology, South-West University
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
