Jean-François Lyotard’s Anti-Humanist Agonistics: Communication and Conflict After the Human
Abstract
In The Differend, postmodern philosopher Jean-François Lyotard presents a communicative theory of conflict. Lyotard terms the element of conflict in society the differend. Here, I propose to approach this difficult concept via anti-humanism. In the first section of this article, I connect the concepts of the differend, language games, and anti-humanism. Lyotard's post-anthropocentric view of discourse as autonomous and self-organizing is the foundational premise of his social thought. In the second section of my article, I bridge the concepts of anti-humanism and the proposed extinction of philosophy, arguing that if anthropocentric critique is obsolete, then a new kind of politics is necessary. In the third section, I conceive of Lyotard’s communicative vision of society as one that accounts for the increasingly automated nature of social systems. In the concluding section, I apply Christian Baier's concepts of "epistemic spheres" and "epistemic differend" to analyze contemporary political polarization, while also engaging critically with Eric Goodfield's recent critique of Lyotard’s perceived liberalism.
References
Ball, K. (2007). Traumatizing theory. The cultural politics of affect in and beyond Psychoanalysis. Other Press. https://otherpress.com/product/traumatizing-theory-9781590512494/
Baier, C. (2024). Narratives of post-truth: Lyotard and the epistemic fragmentation of society. Theory, Culture & Society, 41(1), 95-110. https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764231162027.
Barsky, R. F. (1994). Constructing a productive other. Discourse theory and the convention refugee hearing. John Benjamins Publishing.
Beck, U. (1997). The reinvention of politics. Rethinking modernity in the global social order. Polity. https://www.politybooks.com/bookdetail?book_slug=the-reinvention-of-politics-rethinking-modernity-in-the-global-social-order--9780745617589
Benhabib, S. (1994). Democracy and difference: Reflections on the metapolitics of Lyotard and Derrida. Journal of Political Philosophy, 2(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.1994.tb00013.x.
Bordo, J. (1992). Ecological peril, modern technology and the postmodern sublime. In P. Berry and A. Wenick (Eds.), Shadow of spirit. Postmodernism and religion. 165-181. Routledge.
Cartlidge, J. (2022). Lyotard, the differend and the philosophy of deep disagreement. Synthese, 200, 1-29. 10.1007/s11229-022-03841-5.
Chernilo, D. (2022). Humanism, anti-humanism and posthumanism. In G. Delanty and S. P. Turner (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of contemporary social and political theory. (pp.382-393). Routledge.
Descombes, V. (1993). The barometer of modern reason. On the philosophies of current Events. Oxford University Press. https://books.google.bg/books/about/The_Barometer_of_Modern_Reason.html?id=JKSwAAAAIAAJ&redir_esc=y
Dolphijn, R., and Van der Tuin, I. (2011). Pushing dualism to an extreme: On the philosophical impetus of a new materialism. Continental Philosophy Review, 44, 383-400. 10.1007/s11007-011-9197-2.
Ferworn-Horawa, K. (2024). Aisthesis in non/anthropocentric perspective: The consequences of agential realism for the categories of human and nonhuman in aesthetic research. In J. Godlewicz-Adamiec (Ed.), Re-thinking agency: Non-anthropocentric approaches. (pp.35-51). Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Ford, D. R. (2021). Inhuman educations: Jean-François Lyotard, pedagogy, thought. Brill. https://philpapers.org/rec/FORIEJ
Geiman, K. P. (1990). Lyotard's ’Kantian socialism’. Philosophy & social criticism, 16(1), 23-37. https://doi.org/10.1177/019145379001600102.
Gelder, K. and Jacobs, J. M. (1994). Uncanny Australia. Sacredness and identity in a postcolonial nation. Melbourne University Press. https://www.research.ed.ac.uk/en/publications/uncanny-australia-sacredness-and-identity-in-a-postcolonial-natio/
Getachew, A. (2016). Universalism after the post-colonial turn: Interpreting the Haitian revolution. Political Theory, 44(6), 821-845. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591716661018.
Gill, J. H. (2000). The tacit mode. Michael Polanyi's postmodern philosophy. State University of New York Press. https://philpapers.org/rec/GILTTM-2
Goodfield, E. (2020). Postmodern paper tiger: Lyotard, Baudrillard, and the contemporary politics of poststructuralist subversion. Public Culture, 16(2), 233-252. https://doi.org/10.1215/17432197-8233420.
Goorha, P. (2016). Innovation as clarifications: lessons from bat and ball sports. Innovation, 18(3), 327-339. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2016.1238288.
Jenkins, K. (2009). At the limits of history. Essays on theory and practice. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/At-the-Limits-of-History-Essays-on-Theory-and-Practice/Jenkins/p/book/9780415472364
Luhmann, N. (2012). Theory of society. Volume I. Stanford University Press. https://searchworks.stanford.edu/view/in00000295699
Luhmann, N. (2000). The reality of the mass media. Stanford University Press. https://www.sup.org/books/media-studies/reality-mass-media
Lyotard, J. F. (1984). The postmodern condition. A report on knowledge. University of Minnesota Press.
Lyotard, J. F., and Thébaud, J. L. (1985). Just gaming. University of Minnesota Press.
Lyotard, J. F. (1988). The differend. Phrases in dispute. University of Minnesota Press.
Lyotard, J. F. (1989). Lessons in paganism. In A. Benjamin (Ed.), The Lyotard reader (pp.122-154). Basil Blackwell.
Lyotard, J. F. (1991). The inhuman. Reflections on time. Stanford University Press. https://www.sup.org/books/theory-and-philosophy/inhuman
Lyotard, J. F. (1994). Lessons on the analytic of the sublime. Stanford University Press. https://www.sup.org/books/theory-and-philosophy/lessons-analytic-sublime
Lyotard, J. F. (1997). Postmodern fables. University of Minnesota Press. https://books.google.bg/books/about/Postmodern_Fables.html?id=BzCPSk7rG3MC&redir_esc=y
McLennan, M. R. (2016). Anthro-paralogy: Antihumanism in Lyotard’s late works. In H. Bickis and R. Shields (Eds.), Rereading Jean-François Lyotard. Essays on his later works (pp.43-55). Routledge. https://www.academia.edu/5660889/Anthro_paralogy_Antihumanism_in_Lyotard_s_Late_Works
Malpas, S. (2002). Jean-François Lyotard. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Jean-Francois-Lyotard/Malpas/p/book/9780415256155
Mancheno, T. (2023). Ma(r)king the difference. Multiculturalism and the politics of translation. Springer.DOI:10.1007/978-3-658-40924-1
Mayr, E. (1992). The idea of teleology. Journal of the History of Ideas, 53(1), 117-135. https://doi.org/10.2307/2709913.
Newman, S. (2011). Postanarchism: a politics of anti-politics. Journal of Political Ideologies, 16(3), 313-327. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2011.607301.
Neyrat, F. (2018). The unconstructable Earth: An ecology of separation. Fordham University Press. https://fordhampress.com/the-unconstructable-earth-hb-9780823282586.html
Noonan, J. (2004). Critical humanism and the politics of difference. McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Noyer, J. M. (2016). Transformation of collective intelligences. Perspective of transhumanism. Wiley-ISTE. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Transformation+of+Collective+Intelligences%3A+Perspective+of+Transhumanism-p-9781848219106
Pearson, J. (2015). Language, subjectivity and the Agon. A comparative study of Nietzsche and Lyotard. Logoi, 1(3), 76-101.https://philarchive.org/archive/PEALSA-2
Piger, J. (2009). Econometrics: Models of regime changes. In R. A. Meyers (Ed.), Encyclopedia of complexity and systems science. 2744-2757. Springer.
Pucci, P. (1977). Hesiod and the language of poetry. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Pryor, D. (2016). Postmodern philosophy and market anarchism. Allies or enemies? Postmodern solutions to market anarchist problems. Center For a Stateless Society, https://c4ss.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Postmodern-Philosophy-and-Market-Anarchism-Allies-or-Enemies-FINAL.pdf
Rambo, D. (2016). Of fear and exaltation: the sublime autonomy of finance. Angelaki, 21(2), 83-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969725X.2016.1182728.
Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Ruthrof, H. (1992). Pandora and Occam. On the limits of language and literature. Routledge.
Simons, M. (2022). Jean-François Lyotard and postmodern technoscience. Philosophy & Technology, 35(2), 1-18. 10.1007/s13347-022-00517-3.
Smit, N. (2024). Hierarchies inferred from different agonistic behaviours are not always comparable. Journal of Animal Ecology, 93(12), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.14203.
Standish, P. (2002). Humanism, anti-humanism, the inhuman. In A. W. Musschenga, W. Van Haaften, B. Spiecker and M. Slors (Eds.), Personal and moral identity. (pp.259-283). Springer.
Stringer, R. (2014). Knowing victims. Feminism, agency and victim politics in neoliberal times. Routledge.https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315880129
Walton, M. V. (2013). Expressing the inexpressible in Lyotard and Pseudo-Dionysius. Bearing witness as a spiritual exercise. Lexington Books. https://philpapers.org/rec/WALETI
Weber, S. (1985). Afterword: Literature—just making it. In J. F. Lyotard and J. L. Thébaud, Just gaming. 101-123. University of Minnesota Press.
Williams, J. (2000). Lyotard and the political. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203004906
Wittgenstein, L. (1980). Culture and value. University of Chicago Press. http://virtual-weltanschauung.org/doc/witt.pdf
Woodward, A. (2017). Lyotard and the inhuman condition. Reflections on nihilism, information and art. Edinburgh University. Press.https://edinburghuniversitypress.com/book-lyotard-and-the-inhuman-condition.html
Copyright (c) 2025 Academic seminar "Media and Education", Department of Sociology, South-West University
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
