Affective Scaffolding to Mediate the Use of Emergent Technology
Technology is reshaping the micro-ecologies of developing, becoming a part of it. It impacts and enables reconfiguration of social interaction in everyday situations. The study aims to bring a macro and micro discussion about close interconnection with complex technology and how these interactions have reciprocal implications between materiality and subjectivity. The broad research question is: How do we deal and interact with daily increasingly complex technology? A theoretical perspective is outlined about the subject and object relationship, focusing on new technology in the baby day living. One key point stressed in this paper is the affective scaffolding that could be a key point for social mediation with technology. To support the reflection, some illustrative examples are proposed from a naturalistic observation. In particular, the study focus on one 1-years old baby interacting with a smartphone and a robot toy. A final discussion is proposed to discuss the material and subjective dialectic interactions.
Alač, M., Movellan, J., & Tanaka, F. (2011). When a robot is social: Spatial arrangements and multimodal semiotic engagement in the practice of social robotics. Social Studies of Science, 41(6), 893-926.
Beguin, P., & Rabardel, P. (2000). Designing for instrument-mediated activity. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 12, 173–190. https://aisel.aisnet.org/sjis/vol12/iss1/1/
Belhassein, K., Cochet, H., Clodic, A., Guidetti, M., & Alami, R. (2019). From Children to Robots: How the parallel with developmental psychology can improve human-robot joint activities. Joint Action Meeting.
Candiotto, L., & Dreon, R. (2021). Affective Scaffoldings as Habits: A Pragmatist Approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 945. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.629046
Daniels, H. (2012). Institutional culture, social interaction and learning. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1(1), 2-11.
Di Gironimo, N. (2011). What is technology? Investigating student conceptions about the nature of technology. International Journal of Science Education, 33(10), 1337–1352.
Duus, R., Cooray, M., & Page, N. C. (2018). Exploring human-tech hybridity at the intersection of extended cognition and distributed agency: a focus on self-tracking devices. Frontiers in psychology, 9.
Ferrando, F. (2013). Posthumanism, transhumanism, antihumanism, metahumanism, and new materialisms. Existenz, 8(2), 26-32.
Gillen, J., & Kucirkova, N. (2018). Percolating spaces: Creative ways of using digital technologies to connect young children’s school and home lives. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(5), 834–846. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12666
Global Internet Use Report (2019) shorturl.at/oJKSV
Knorr Cetina, K. (2001). Objectual practice. In K. Cetina, E.von Savigny, & T.R.Schatzki (Eds.), The practice turns into contemporary theory. Routledge.
Hayles, N. K. (2008). How we became posthuman: virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. University of Chicago Press.
Hasse, C. (2020). Posthumanist learning: what robots and cyborgs teach us about being ultra-social. Routledge.
Hollan, J., Hutchins, E. Kirsh, D. (2000). Distributed cognition: toward a new foundation for Human-computer Interaction Research, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7(2), 174-196.
Impedovo, M. A., Andreucci, C., Ginestié, J. (2015). Mediation of artefacts, tools and technical objects: an international and french perspective. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 27(1), 19-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9335-y
Impedovo, M.A. & Guarnieri de Campos Tebet, G. (2019). Baby wandering inside day-care: retracing directionality through cartography. Early Child Development and Care, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2019.1680548
Knitter, B., & Zemp, M. (2020). Digital family life: A systematic review of the impact of parental smartphone use on parent-child interactions. Digital Psychology, 1(1), 29-43.
Latour, B. (1996). Petite réflexion sur le culte moderne des dieux faitiches. Synthélabo.
Latour, B. (2003). Is remodernization occurring - and if so, how to prove it? A commentary on Ulrich Beck. Theory Culture and Society, 20(1), 35- 48.
Lawtoo, N. (2019). The philosophy of imitation. Focus, EU Research.
Lawtoo, N. (2020). Homo mimeticus: sameness and difference replayed. The Leuven Philosophy Newsletter 27, 9- 21.
Leroi-Gourhan, A. (1993). Gesture and speech. MIT Press.
Nancy, J. L. (2000). Being singular plural. Stanford University Press.
Overdijk, M., & van Diggelen, W. (2008). Appropriation of a shared workspace: organising principles and their application. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3, 165-192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-008-9038-4
Pea, R., & Cole, M. (2019). The living hand of the past: the role of technology in development. Human Development, 62(1-2), 14- 39. https://doi.org/10.1159/000496073
Salvatore, S., & Venuleo, C. (2013). Field and dynamic nature of sensemaking. Theoretical and methodological implications. Papers on Social Representations, 22(2), 21-1. https://psr.iscte-iul.pt/index.php/PSR/article/view/310
Schraube, E. (2009). Technology as materialised action and its ambivalences. Theory & Psychology, 19(2), 296-312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354309103543
Simondon, G. (1989). Du mode d’existence des objets techniques. Aubier.
Sørensen, E. (2009). The materiality of learning: technology and knowledge in educational practice. Cambridge University Press.
Suchman, L. (2005). Affiliative objects. Organisation, 12(3), 379-399.
Suchman, L. (2007). Human-machine reconfigurations: plans and situated actions. Cambridge University Press
Tebet, G. G., Impedovo, M. A., & Pontes, L. C. B. (2021). Babies and borders: between individuation and materiality of the infant life. Human Arenas, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-021-00243-w
UNESCO (2021). It matters how we open knowledge: building structural equity.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. Readings on the development of children, 23(3), 34-41.
Wartofsky, M. W. (1973). Perception, representation, and the forms of action: towards a historical epistemology. In M. Wartofsky (Ed.), Models: representation and the scientific understanding reidel. Dordrecht.
Wertsch, J. (2007). National narratives and the conservative nature of collective memory. Neohelicon, 34(2), 23-33.
Copyright (c) 2021 Academic seminar "Media and Education", Department of Sociology, South-West University
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.