Multiculturalism in Azerbaijan
The last decades of the 20th century are saturated with events transforming socio-cultural reality. We have to analyze ongoing processes and new trends; therefore, this report is focusing on the mutual linking within the two concepts – philosophy and multiculturalism in Azerbaijan. One of the aims is to explore the advantages of the country – its key geographic location, traditions, philosophical thoughts and the ideology of the so-called Azerbaijanism. In the present report, the attitudes and ideas of Azerbaijan philosophers on the western failed policy of multiculturalism and the reasons for its opposition to the Islamic world are traced. It is analyzed how, against the background of this failure, Azerbaijan sets its own multiculturalism as an effective and working model in the context of the specific discourse of the post-modern, which, together with the Islamic solidarity and tolerance, is among the main principles of the ideology of Azerbaijanism. In Azerbaijan the model of multiculturalism offers the opportunity to consider an all-human, universal context, which, in turn, allows us to perceive the modern, dynamically developing Azerbaijan society in its completeness and unity. Multiculturalism is immanently characteristic for modernity. In the Azerbaijan philosophy, it is viewed as a way of a non-violent, peaceful sublation of contradictions and conflicts between separate nations and countries.
The report aims to distribute a philosophical concept or a specific type of worldview, which is less known for the West, requiring the philosophical consideration of the problems, which are emblematic for this epoch. In conclusion the idea for the establishment of collaborative research networks is developed.
Abasov, A. (2003). Dialog tsivilizatsiy - dialog kulytur - dialog religiy// Globalynoe upravlenie na povorotnom эtape: inovatsionnыe podhodы k ustanovleniyu mira v izmenyayushtemsya obshtestve [Dialogue of civilizations - dialogue of cultures - dialogue of religions // Global governance at a turning stage: innovative approaches to peace in a changing society]. Dom skazki.
Gabibbeyli, I. (2019). Istoriko-kulyturnыe osnovania kontseptsii azerbaydzhanstva v politicheskoy filosofii Gaydara Alieva. [Historical and cultural foundations of the concept of Azerbaijanism in the political philosophy of Gaidar Aliyev]. In V. M. Mamedov, and A. N. Chomakov (Eds.), Dialog kulytur i vыzovы sovremennoy эpohi [Dialogue of cultures and challenges of the modern era]. Canon-Plus. https://kanonplus.ru/books/knigi-kanonplyus/dialog-kultur-i-vyzovy-sovremennoy-epokhi/ https://iphras.ru/uplfile/rusph/articles/kats_dialog.pdf
Danilov, A. (2001). K novoy paradigme upravlenia mirovыmi protsessami [Towards a new paradigm for managing global processes]. Problemы teorii i praktiki upravlenia, 1, 41-46.
Dennet, D. (2001). Pochemu nam vazhno ponimaty эto pravilyno. Postmodernizm i pravda. [Why is it important for us to understand this correctly. Postmodernism and the truth]. Voprosы filosofii, 8. 93-108.
Kant, I. (1966). Sochinenia v 6 tomah. T. 6 [Works in 6 volumes ]. Mыsly.
Lok, Dzh. (2012). Pismo za tolerantnostta [Letter of Tolerance ]. Siela.
Mamedaliev, Z. (2019). Zapadnoevropeyskoe razocharovanie v multikulyturalizme [Western European Disappointment in Multiculturalism]. In V. M. Mamedov, and A. N. Chomakov (Eds.), Dialog kulytur i vыzovы sovremennoy эpohi [Dialogue of cultures and challenges of the modern era]. Canon-Plus. https://iphras.ru/uplfile/rusph/articles/kats_dialog.pdf
Mamedzade, I. (2018). Filosof v kulyture [The philosopher in culture]. Voprosы filosofii, 12.
Mehtiev, R. (2004). Azerbaydzhan: vыzovы globalizatsii [Azerbaijan: the challenges of globalization]. Eni Nesil.
Mizov, M. (2018). Balgarskiyat etnicheski model – ima li go oshte? [The Bulgarian ethnical model - are there any more?]. Avangard prima.
Movsumova, L. (2019). Mnogoobrazie kulytur i religioznaya tolerantnosty [Cultural diversity and religious]. In V. M. Mamedov, and A. N. Chomakov (Eds.), Dialog kulytur i vыzovы sovremennoy эpohi [Dialogue of cultures and challenges of the modern era]. Canon-Plus. https://iphras.ru/uplfile/rusph/articles/kats_dialog.pdf
Feyerabend, P. (1986). Protiv metodologicheskogo prinuzhdenia [Against methodological coercion]. Mыsly.
Hantingtan, S. (2006). Sblasak na tsivilizatsiite i preobrazuvaneto na svetovnia red [The clash of civilizations and the transformation of world order]. Obsidian.
Dennett, D. (1999/2000). Why getting it right matters. Postmodernism and truth. Free Inquiry, 20(1), 40-43.
Habermas, J. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action. Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Vol.1. Beacon
Copyright (c) 2019 Academic seminar "Media and Education", Department of Sociology, South-West University
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.